To: Rayne
From: Jimmy
Subject: HI-PAR
Hi, I just got your email, I’ve been off-line for a few days. I can set you up as the first
one to do the HI-PAR, under archives I maintain. We’re planning a national vote
next year, free for everyone, where all representatives in an imaginary parliament,
may self-categorize under the word or words as they wish. Once the HI-PAR gets
100 free appointees, we can hold the HI-PAR election, meanwhile we’ll also
have a national ballot. I’m trying to work with the current cabinet, to have our
big deal on July 4th over the next four years.
I’d use either you name Harry, or Rayne, whatever you wish Your party/category
must be your “true” one.
Thanks for your interest, I can appoint you as member of state parliament (MSP)
and create an email and/or web link to your name, and that will put you on the
monthly bulletin automatically too. (be sure to email me if/when you don’t want
the bulletin, or if you “stand down” or any other appointments or improvements).
Thanks for your interest,
Best,
–Jimmy
Rayne Van-Dunem wrote:
Hi, this is the administrator of the hawaii_nation community at livejournal (http://livejournal.com/community/hawaii_nation). I’d like to ask you, the administators of the US parliament website, if it is feasible to establish a parliament in Hawaii, so as to allow all under-the-radar parties, movements, and organizations that aren’t allowed a voice in Hawaiian politics. Such would be especially important for Hawaii, considering the fact that it has been illegally occupied by the United States since 1893, which, prior to that year, had recognized Hawaii repeatedly as an independent and sovereign nation.
Sincerely, Harry Underwood aka Rayne Van-Dunem (http://livejournal.com/~rayne_vandunem)
PS: The most representative type of parliament is the one that has the lowest-possible ratio of MP to citizens in a constituency, as in equal proportional representation. So as far as the California parliament goes, the more-localized proportional representation in a unicameral parliament would be either (on a ratio of MP to citizens in a single constituency) 1:100,000 (which, if bringing into account the current estimate of the census in California, would give a unicameral parliament a number of around 320 members).
Just a suggestion for the California parliament.
