All posts by Harry Underwood

Unknown's avatar

About Harry Underwood

Website designer, blogger. Columbus, GA. #LGBT #p2 #wordpress

The Jewish people, Conservatism, and Liberalism

I have a question: why is it that ethnic Judaists were violently persecuted in both countries whose governments espoused a conservative, nativist, pro-religious ideology and countries whose governments espoused a liberal, Marxist ideology?

The ethnic Judaists of Germany were massacred by the country’s Nazi, virulently anti-Communist government back during the first half of the 20th century, and were oppressed by the Communist, anti-Nazi government of the Soviet Union.

Following the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948, oppression was visited upon the ethnic Judaists of South West Asia by both Islamic conservative and Arab socialist governments, which led to a massive exodus from that region to Israel from the 1960’s to the 1980’s.

In both types of government, the ethnic Jews were condemned for espousing or associating themselves with contrary, anti-government ideologies: in Nazi Germany, they were lumped together with gays and communists in the concentration camps, while in the Soviet Union, they were lumped together with gays and conservative religious figures in the gulags.

Within Israel, today you have a clash of Jewish conservatism and Jewish liberalism, which has only progressed since the establishments of the first Labor Zionist kibbutz in Israel in the 1920s. This has been seen in numerous misunderstandings between progressive social activists (who often advocate for peace and a two-state solution) and conservative religious activists (who advocate for greater recognition of Jewish law and tradition and the fight against Palestinian militants), including calls for prosecution, assassination, deportation, or divestment of political office.

A flashpoint in the battle between religious conservatives and social liberals in Israel is the debate over civil rights for the country’s LGBT minority, which has led to violent incursions at venues such as the Jerusalem Gay Pride parade.

The battle between conservatism and liberalism has also been felt in the Palestinian territories, most recently in the violent split between the social democratic nationalist Fatah in the West Bank and the religious conservative nationalist Hamas in the Gaza Strip.

But then back to the question: why is it that the Jews were persecuted by both avowed “leftists” and avowed “rightists” for being in cahoots with the opposing ideology of the time? Why is that the only Jewish country in the world comes under criticism from avowed leftists and rightists? And why is it that Jewish leftists and Jewish rightists have assaulted each other over the same or similar rifts and issues of which their forefathers were often accused in their former home countries?

It’s very ironic, and weird.

A thing to remember about software licenses

The copyright is for the vindictive software business. The copyleft is for the vindictive software hacker collective.

Case in point: the apology from Monsoon for having initially refused to make their source code modifications available, and the response from the Digg peanut gallery.

Of course, they, the copyright and copyleft, are eventually going to learn alot from each other. I think they each have something that the other lacks: the copyleft has distributed development man-hours and manpower behind it, while the copyright has lots of ideas to test out, money to devote and markets which need better software for their computing appliances.

Eventually, the two will push computing technology forward. The copyright will lead the way, but their implementation will be half-baked; the copyleft will take what the copyright created and develop it into a standard.

But where is the copycenter, the permissive software licenses, in all this?

Does it simply pick up the slack that the copyright and copyleft drop in their move to progress? Maybe its not as stuck on supposed slights or enemies of “innovation” (EULAs) or “freedom” (GPL).

It just wants to be used.

Stuff

Books are in, now to catch up.

Useless links of the day:

And I’m trying to wean myself off of meat. Steak isn’t that much of an option, and pig (bacon, ham, and sausage) is cuisine non grata here. The only meat that we do here is turkey (turkey bacon, turkey sausage, turkey sandwich meat) and chicken.

Now if there was only such a thing as turkey steak…

Also, ranch is the new ketchup. I like it on green beans (thanks, Mom!).

Peace.

Why is it that Black people are so….raciosexist?

Or…is bisexuality a biologically-inherent trait of European men?

I mean honestly, I can’t count how many times that I’ve seen this idea pushed by disgruntled African-Americans in regards to the sexuality of white men?

Oh, right: I can.

Honestly, are Afrocentricity and Gay rights (or even Feminism) that diametrically opposed to each other? Afrocentrics love to lambast other sexualities and interpretations of rights+and+wrongs besides their own, but balk in and react with utter hypocrisy and duplicity when criticized by their targets.

Really, its just a manifestation of the sort of jealousy-driven ideology that was present in the Hutu supremacy movement in Rwanda and Burundi.

All-in-one Linux PC?

I have an FA account, although I doubt that I’ll use it anytime soon.

Anyway, I wonder if the scrappy few computer companies which have decided to choose a particular Linux default distribution (like System76 picking Ubuntu) have ever thought about offering an iMac-like all-in-one PC?

I’m asking that because one of the main criticisms by both Linux and Windows users of the different iterations of the “Mac platform”, particularly the iMac, is that it isn’t expandable or extensible on the hardware level. It’s just whatever is offered to you in that all-in-one package by Apple.

However, while it is a weak point to many who are more accustomed to more-flexible home computing environments (the sysadmins, the gamers, etc.), it is also a very strong point or attraction for many others who want a “KISS” approach for their hardware: a monitor, a keyboard, and a mouse, with as few wires with which you would need to entangle yourself.

Of course, the Mac Mini-like small-form-factor computer could whet that whistle, and most of the aforementioned Linux-geared desktop vendors are already selling such systems.

However, the Mac mini is simply a computer that is meant to work with any type of peripheral hardware; the iMac, on the other hand, is a computer that emphasizes whatever is present on the screen (the GUI) above all else, even placing all the hard drives, USB ports, on/off switch, and other such components to the side and back of the monitor.

Really, that’s what the iMac is: a truly media-oriented home computer that isn’t really meant to be portable, or expandable, but simply a voyeur for whatever media is present on the screen.

So it would be particularly interesting to see if a made-for-Linux all-in-one PC can be developed by a desktop computer manufacturer.

What could come out of that, though? What if System76 were to start selling an iMac-like Ubuntu PC? How would it influence the GUI design? Which crowd or audience would be willing to buy such a computer?

One can only wonder about the possibilities…

I don’t think that software, free or proprietary, will do any good for the environment, the way that it looks now.

I mean, why should software, and the growing evolution of it, benefit the environment? It mostly benefits the various manufacturing industries in various forms (especially the companies which make the chipsets for today’s electronic devices), who use the smelly, environmentally-hazardous factories in China, India, and Central America to create these devices (ranging from cell phones to personal computers to servers) which need bigger, better, flashier operating systems every two or so years and are built accordingly to handle such power.

What components do these computers and electronic devices use? They use various materials mined from the most minerally-resourced, most minerally-diverse regions of the world (DR Congo, South Africa, the Andes, etc.). Such ventures have tied into the local conflicts in these areas, such as the Civil War in the eastern DRC (blood diamonds, blood gold, blood coltan?), as millions of dollars in weaponry are to be gained through these minerals by the warlords who thirst for greater political control of these regions.

I mean, sure, we’re on our way out of the industrial age, and the transition from industrialization and industrialism to software and services is similar to the conflicts which accompanied the move from agrarianism and agricultural dependence to industry and manufacturing. Unlike the violent conflicts on the battlefield that accompanied the agriculture-to-industry movement (American Civil War, for example), the battles of this transition are being fought out in the courtroom, with every sort of company suing each other for copyright, patent, or some other form of intellectual property violation just to make a quick few billion dollars/euros in damages just to hold the company’s head just above the waters at the expense of someone else.

But, in the midst of trying to further the advance of software development (for- or non-profit), are we thinking about the environment?

Are we thinking about the ecological consequences of software being dependent upon industry and manufactured components, the makers of which depend upon mining and the building of factories in order to function?

At which point does software help preserve the ecological balance of this planet? Or is it simply a client of those who wish to expand the breadth of human civilization at the natural sciences’ expense?

Why is it that the video gaming lobby (yes, I believe there is such a thing) always address those who object to video games and the video game industry as “idiots” and “morons”?

I mean, sure, you can say that people like Jack Thompson are pretty over the top and are reasonably derided in public, but then the stereotype that all critics of the game industry are usually of his ilk is thrown about by the pro-gamer press as a rule of action, which, to me, seems unfair.

Personally, I don’t care that much for games. I don’t play them at home, and I see the folks at school playing them in the same area of the student center everyday.

Why? Well:

  1. I’m a sore loser
  2. If I play competitively, I might as well be playing flippin’ Mario Kart 64.
  3. It makes no sense to get into them, so I analyze them from afar off, then make my judgments and say to the other players “Have a nice day, then”

Furthermore, the gaming industry. It’s one of the most wasteful products of late-20th-century Western industralization, with billions of dollars being poured into the latest technologies for the biggest hulk consoles that can fit into a living room, and billions more being poured into the creation of DRM-laced, tightly-downtied software and firmware utilities whose compositions are kept secret from the public for fear of their 1 or 2 other competitors “beating” them in “market share” or some other consultantese.

And these corporations are the darlings of geeks because…..why? What type of good or service are these mouthbreathing wastes of space providing to Western civilization?

This also goes into the PC gaming subindustry (Blizzard, for example). For what good is World of Warcraft except personal, electronically-simulated bragging rights that translate into billions of dollars in profit for one particular corporation?

Where is the imparting, sharing, and application of real-world challenges and ideas?

I don’t find it in the gaming industry as it is, or as it has been.

Leopard’s 3D Dock, and its influence

If you’ve seen the completely overhauled Apple.com recently (that is, within the last three weeks), you would’ve seen that the Dock for October’s Mac OS X v10.5 has been “fleshed out”, gaining a 3D, reflective look that immediately divided the opinions of Apple fans.

Me, I like the new dock, but I don’t really like the new top menubar (others don’t, either).

The reason why I’m interested in this new dock is because, all of a sudden, something as common as program launcher icons (which are passe to most Windows and GNOME/KDE users) are given the appearance of tiny applications with a life of their own.

Furthermore, the “3d”, inward-reaching appearance of the new dock, IMO, may be a preliminary shot for breaking the paradigm of the flat, WIMP user interface that we’ve all been used to seeing since the advent of the commercial desktop GUI in the 1984 Macintosh.

Does this mean that the future of the user interface is reaching *into* the desktop?

Already, this appearance has been added to two of Linux’s current killer apps, the bouncy Kiba-Dock (yes, its Naruto-related) and shiny AWN (with decent-looking screenies, sans the reflection).

So this should be interesting.

Summer’s here…

Well, might as well be. No rain for weeks now.

They’re rationing water down here. Funny, since I was only mentioning a torrential downpour last month.

In the meantime, I’ve decided to start working on the Blackboard tutorials again; the PHP labs, however, are another story.

I’m starting to get bored with Digg and Wikipedia, btw. Nothing new gets posted to Digg anymore, and the Wikipedia editing is…well, maybe I should take a break from it.

YouTube’s interface is starting to annoy as well. I mean, sure, it’s useful for its content and social networking, but working with it feels less like enjoyment and more like a hurdle or threshold to find something that you want.

Don’t worry, <lj user=”lordsathien”>, I’ll catch up with you and Prentiss on the game. Just can’t do it right now.

I’m either not getting enough sleep, are exceedingly worried about every little thing, or I’m just very, physically lazy right now.

Take your pick.

Yeltsin, economic liberalism, and the need for education

Sorry for the long period off; I’ve spent most of my time on Digg and Wikipedia (obviously), with the want to update this ol’ journal not occurring to me until just now.

As you may’ve heard, Boris from Russia just died yesterday.

He was a drinker, a rabble-rouser, a fidgety old git…,

he led Russia in the aftermath of the Great Soviet experiment, swinging the door of the country to Western economic liberalism like nobody’s business,

he led it through the oft-violent, oft-needy turbulence of 90’s-era recessions;

and his efforts to establish Russia apart from its predecessor state only paid off after he left office in 2000.

This article from BBC News talked about how Russia’s presently-strong, Putin-era economy only reached that state because of Yeltsin’s economic policies (only tempered after Putin’s government drew back the power that Yeltsin’s had given to the oligarchs and energy barons).

It also talks about how the gap between the rich and poor has only gotten wider since the introduction of free-market reforms in the late 80’s and early 90’s.

I can agree, in particular, on how the reforms caught everyone off guard, and how only a few have been able to make it up to the top of Russia’s economy.

But why were they able to get up so high from, often, literally nothing in their own possession, while others drowned in the depths of poverty?

WHAT I THINK

I think its because of the lack of advance education on free-markets and profits that should’ve been provided to the masses before Russia came out of the Communist closet, so to speak.

All that was being told to the Russian people was that “We’re going for a free market. Everybody will be rich, Russia will be rich and powerful and free, etc.”

They weren’t told about the real ins and outs of “marketing, advertising and exchange rates; or barter, leasing and – not least – profits.”

They weren’t educated.

They were simply dragged into this system without prior, real-world knowledge of what they were getting into.

Same thing happened in Latin America (pre-Chavez). The poor were kept ignorant of the immediate hurt and the long, hard haul to economic stability. The social safety nets were cut from under them by the political, Harvard-educated elite, and fell flat on their backs.

Free markets aren’t bad. Economic freedom should be guaranteed, IMO. But come on…why are they poor when the economy is going well?

Why does the gap between the rich and poor continue to widen in free-market societies?

And why do these countries often elect such stridently-xenophobic politicians as Hugo Chavez to office when they get sick of neoliberal policies which are ideally meant to work great wonders for their societies?

It’s like Venezuela is sick, and bodily rejects the necessary food that should keep them from starving in their own illness.

And why do nationalist Americans get so surprised at this?

I don’t get it…

Anyway, here’s to Boris: