Early feelings after Harris picked Walz
This feels awkward for me to see this play out today. I’ve been following Minnesota politics since at least 2019, when I first started reading about the Minneapolis 2040 plan, which made Minneapolis the poster child of the YIMBY movement.
The news of how the Minneapolis 2040 plan allowed for the suppression of rent increases across the city accompanied the increasing success of movements in Oregon and California to increase housing density.
My interest in Minnesota has grown from that to the George Floyd protests and riots, to the DFL winning the slim trifecta in 2022, to the numerous legislative victories secured over the last two sessions, to the screaming matches accompanying the end of this last session, to Walz now being selected for this campaign as running mate.
But the DFL trifecta, if it holds in November’s state house elections, will have to debate spreading housing abundance at the state level next legislative session. Because, if anything, the decades-long impact of the previous restrictive housing regime – the single-family zoning, parking mandates and legacies of redlining, all enacted at the municipal and county level across Minnesota – led in part to the 2020 riots. But the city governments outside of Minneapolis will not give up that power over zoning easily.
For Harris-Walz, the campaign’s rhetoric in favor of progressive policy on housing will easily run up against strong economic and political forces, but will also lack political gravitas if the campaign does not embrace housing abundance and density-friendly zoning reform federally.
After the Raleigh Speech
The YIMBYs are celebrating VP Harris as the YIMBY candidate after her first policy speech in Raleigh.
Regarding the speech, I wonder how much of her statements on housing reform are a continuation or strengthening of the Biden-Harris “Housing Supply Action Plan” from 2022.
Housing Supply Action Plan
As of August 13, 2024:
- the Federal Housing Finance Agency had approved policies and pilots to reduce closing costs for homeowners, including a pilot to waive the requirement for lender’s title insurance on certain refinances
- the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau would pursue rulemaking and guidance to address anticompetitive closing costs imposed by lenders on homebuyers and homeowners.[2]
- the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD):
- announced a Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing (PRO Housing) program to provide $85 million in $10 million grants to jurisdictions which have acute housing shortages and are working to address barriers to housing production and preservation;[3]
- updated its guidelines to increase the dollar amount threshold at which a multifamily loan for FHA-insured mortgages is considered a large loan and is subject to additional underwriting requirements from $75 million to $120 million;[4]
- allowed larger loans to participate in the agency’s Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Pilot Program;
- allowed public housing authorities (PHAs) to more easily use housing vouchers and mixed-finance transactions to create or preserve housing;[5]
- published new guidance for public housing authorities and multifamily housing owners participating in the Rental Assistance Demonstration;
- launched a Legacy Challenge to encourage communities which directly receive Community Development Block Grants from HUD to leverage low-cost, low-interest loans for housing investments
- announced funding for research into commercial-to-residential conversions for a potential guide for state and local governments.[2]
- the Department of Transportation:
- announced its Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods program to provide up to $3.16 billion for planning and capital construction projects that prioritize disadvantaged communities and improve access to daily destinations, including a $450 million Regional Partnership Challenge to incentivize regional partnerships;
- released new guidance to streamline and clarify requirements for closing DOT loans for residential development near transit, including commercial-to-residential conversions;[6]
- the Economic Development Administration (EDA) updated its “Investment Priorities” that guide the agency’s grantmaking to include an emphasis on efficient land use and density;
- the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced its $27 billion Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) to mobilize capital for retrofits of existing homes and buildings, construction of zero emissions buildings, and commercial to residential conversions, among others.
- the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation proposed a method which would exempt several maintenance activities from review under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for historic preservation of millions of federally-funded, licensed or owned housing units nationwide.[7][8]
We won’t find out more until after this week, but the current HSAP is the most thorough piece of government action in favor of housing density in U.S. history, even though the record amount of housing construction this year is still well below the millions-long backlog.
It may be billed as an “all of government plan”, and it may make heavy use of DOT and HUD, but it doesn’t go far enough in maximizing executive power to push cities to pass pro-density zoning reform.
Harris’ HSAP Part 2
To quote from Harris’ press release:
Vice President Harris knows that our nation’s housing affordability crisis is making it hard for tens of millions of Americans to make ends meet while putting the American Dream of homeownership out of reach for too many working families. That’s why she will launch an urgent and comprehensive four-year plan to lower housing costs for working families and end America’s housing shortage.
- Calling for the Construction of 3 Million New Housing Units To End the Housing Supply Shortage in the Next Four Years. There’s a serious housing shortage across America, and it’s driving prices up. Vice President Harris will work in partnership with industry to build the housing we need, both to rent and to buy, and to take down barriers that stand in the way of building new housing, including at the state and local levels. This will make rents and mortgages cheaper.
- First-Ever Tax Incentive for Building Starter Homes. A Harris-Walz Administration will propose the first-ever tax incentive for homebuilders who build starter homes sold to first-time homebuyers—alleviating the shortage of houses on the market for aspiring homeowners. This would complement the Neighborhood Homes Tax Credit that encourages investment in homes that would otherwise be too costly or difficult to develop or rehabilitate.
- A Historic Expansion of the Existing Tax Incentive for Businesses That Build Rental Housing that is Affordable.
- A New Federal Fund To Spur Innovative Housing Construction. A Harris-Walz Administration will propose a new $40 billion innovation fund—doubling down on the $20 billion Biden-Harris Administration’s proposed innovation fund. Like that proposal, it would empower local governments to fund local solutions to build housing. It would also go further to support innovative methods of construction financing, and empower developers and homebuilders to design and build rental and housing solutions that are affordable—with one condition: they must show they will deliver results. This fund will support the expansion of innovative local efforts, like those in Wake County, North Carolina where they are using American Rescue Plan funds to build or preserve 2,400 affordable housing units including a 100-unit development coming online at Kings Ridge and a 176-unit affordable housing development at Tyron Station. Vice President Harris will also take action to make certain federal lands eligible to be repurposed for new housing developments that families can afford.
- Cut Red Tape and Needless Bureaucracy. These plans will build on the Biden-Harris Administration’s efforts to cut red tape and enable more home building to bring down housing costs—which have advanced record levels of new home construction. Pushing this forward also means streamlining permitting processes and reviews, including for transit-oriented and conversion development, so builders can get homes on the market sooner and bring down costs.
- Lowering the Rent for Hardworking Americans by Taking on Corporate and Major Landlords. In addition to ongoing efforts by Vice President Harris and President Biden to expand rental assistance for hard-pressed Americans including for veterans, boost housing supply for those without homes, enforce fair housing laws, and make sure corporate landlords can’t use taxpayer dollars to unfairly rip off renters, today she is proposing plans to:
- Stop Wall Street Investors from Buying Up and Marking Up Homes in Bulk. Community after community feels taken advantage of by Wall Street investors and distant landlords. Vice President Harris is calling on Congress to pass the Stop Predatory Investing Act, to curtail these practices by removing key tax benefits for major investors who acquire large numbers of single-family rental homes.
- Stop Rent-Setting Data Firms From Price Fixing To Raise Rents by Double Digits. Corporate landlords are using private equity-backed price-setting tools to collude with each other and jack up rents dramatically in communities across the country. Vice President Harris is calling on Congress to pass the Preventing the Algorithmic Facilitation of Rental Housing Cartels Act, to crack down on these companies that contribute to surging rent prices.
- Providing Historic $25,000 Down-Payment Support for First-Time Homeowners. Many Americans work hard at their jobs, save, and pay their rent on time month after month. But they can’t save enough after paying their rent and other bills to save for a down payment—denying them a shot at owning a home and building wealth. As the Harris-Walz plan starts to expand the supply of entry-level homes, they will, during their first term, provide working families who have paid their rent on time for two years and are buying their first home up to $25,000 in down-payment assistance, with more generous support for first-generation homeowners. The Biden-Harris administration initially proposed providing $25,000 in downpayment assistance only for 400,000 first-generation home buyers—or homebuyers whose parents don’t own a home—and a $10,000 tax credit for first-time home buyers. Vice President Harris’s plan will simplify and significantly expand that plan by providing on average $25,000 for all eligible first-time home buyers, while ensuring full participation by first-generation home buyers. It will expand the reach of down-payment assistance, allowing over 4 million first time-buyers over 4 years to get significant down payment assistance.
My view on Harris’ housing plan
Initially, Harris’ initial announced plan to go after price-gouging scared the YIMBYs and enraged Trump supporters, with conservative economists outright denying the existence of price gouging as a major cause for inflation and sticker shock. But the broader plan announced in Raleigh, as described in the press release, turned the YIMBYs back in her favor. Blogger Noah Smith compared her plan on housing to an adaptation of Singapore’s model, in which the government owns 90% of the land, citizens purchase a 99-year lease on the property, and the government issues a helpful grant to first-time homebuyers (and a significantly-lesser grant to second-time homebuyers).
However, if Harris/Walz are elected but lack a trifecta (which is likely at this point), I think the part of her plan that would “make certain federal lands eligible to be repurposed for new housing developments that families can afford”, the most “Singapore-like” portion, is perhaps the most direct action that they could take, but it would need further expansion.
Room for Improvement
What about private or public entities which receive funding from, or have (sub)contracts with, the departments of Education, Defense, Veterans, Health and Human Services, and maybe Interior, not to mention other independent agencies? Could the White House hinge federal funding or (sub)contracts upon recipient institutions and companies reforming their zoning policies along the White House’s preferred model zoning code, as well as expeditious compliance and permitting processes?
Imagine what this could do for on- or off-campus housing for students, faculty or employees of colleges and universities which receive federal funding. Imagine what this could do for military and veteran families who live near military bases and VA hospitals. And imagine the indirect effects for those who don’t live as close to these entities.
Also, this brings to mind what avenues are available for federally-owned land which is within city limits, like properties owned by Veterans Affairs or HUD. But even the VA has suffered under years of mismanagement which allowed issues like what happened to the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center and Home, the only one of its kind in the United States, to fester.
At least for veterans, there should be some level of collaboration between VA and HUD on housing for veterans, since the VA is so myopically focused on healthcare rather than housing. The HUD–Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH) program (VA.gov, HUD.gov), which combines HUD’s Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) rental assistance for homeless Veterans with case management and clinical services provided, doesn’t seem to be enough. Does the VA need a Veterans Housing Administration, or does HUD need an Office of Veterans’ Housing, to more actively support veterans’ housing needs?
Or maybe this issue of land should involve the Department of the Interior? HUD did sign an MoU with the DOI in August 2023 to allow local communities to acquire federally-owned land in the Las Vegas metro area to build affordable housing at $100 an acre. How much metro-area land is owned by DOI or its Bureau of Land Management (BLM)? Maybe a new BLM Assistant Director for Urban Land Development?
Harris has an opportunity to broaden her HSAP 2.0 into more departments, including Justice, Education, Defense, Veterans, Health and Human Services, and maybe Interior. Like Biden’s National Climate Task Force (including the Energy, Interior and Agriculture Secretaries, the Directors of EPA and CEQ, the National Climate Advisor, the National Clean Energy Advisor and the Special Envoy on Climate Change), Harris will need an Inner Housing Cabinet, consisting of the Secretaries of HUD, Transportation, Interior, VA and Justice, Directors of EPA and CEQ, the National Climate Advisor, and the National Clean Energy Advisor, among others.
So in summary, Harris will need to expand upon her and her predecessor’s HSAP thusly:
- Create a National Housing Task Force aka “Housing Cabinet”
- Appoint a National Housing Advisor to the White House
- Draft a Climate-oriented Executive Order requiring all executive-branch agencies to develop policies which promote housing infill and density on federally-owned land
- Draft a Climate-oriented Executive Order requiring all federal (sub)contractors and funding recipients to prioritize housing infill and density
- Create veterans’ housing offices in both VA and HUD
- Designate an Assistant Director for Urban Land Development in the BLM
- Acquire land within metro areas or cities to lease to private developers of federally-compliant housing construction
- Direct the Justice Department to side with YIMBYs in federal court cases challenging Euclid + other decisions and laws allowing for restrictive zoning, attack such laws on 5th + 14th Amendment grounds
- Defend federal zoning directives from local NIMBYs
- Promote a model zoning code and building code on federally-owned land.
Supply-Side Progressivism
As of this convention, the parties are in realignment on several issues. Perhaps the most consequential realignment will be on housing, construction and zoning. The Democrats’ new taste for (federally- or state-directed) deregulation of housing may not sit well with existing urban or suburban political leaders, but there doesn’t seem to be any other viable way to deal with not only the housing crisis, but also its centrality to the carbon footprint of the United States.
But the Democrats have a long way to go on supply-side progressivism in general, especially when it comes to both selective deregulation (or is it “alter-regulation”?) and funding for supply. And if housing is something where Democrats are experiencing a realignment in favor of deregulation, where else can Democrats also have such a deregulatory shift? Maybe the supply of doctors?
