Category Archives: Tech

Drag Performance, Brand Pages and Personal Identities

The issue of the “Real Name” policy, whereby users are told to use “real” names (not necessarily actual names, but “real-sounding” names), is problematic for social networking services (SNS). It’s especially problematic when SNS operators refer users to use brand pages – profiles which are maintained and moderated corporately by one or more users for organized purposes such as promoting a brand or a movement –  as alternatives to using pseudonyms on their personal profiles. The reason is that such a solution is half-baked on the sites which most emphasize the use of “real names” for users’ profiles, particularly Facebook (and formerly Google+).

Functionality issues

The suggestion by Facebook for preferably-pseudonymous users to use their pseudonyms on brand pages ignores the fact that pages on Facebook offer less interactivity than personal profiles. Facebook pages don’t allow pages – which are built to serve organizations rather than pseudonymous personalities – to form or join groups. In relation to this, Facebook also does not allow brand pages to automatically invite other users to events; compare this to Facebook groups, which allow for automatic invitations of all members to event pages.

Google+ Pages, in comparison, offer a bit more interaction, with the ability to create and join “communities” (equivalent to groups) as your brand page. In addition, G+ Pages can also add user profiles to circles (a more advanced version of Facebook’s “adding friends”) and invite followed profiles, circles of profiles and whole communities to events.

Presentation issues

However, in the case of pseudonymous users being “nudged” to create pages for their pseudonyms, G+ and Facebook both suffer from a high learning curve and a lack of tailoring toward personal identity pseudonyms.

Facebook’s “Create a Page” has six main options: “Local Business or Place”, “Company, Organization or Institution”, “Brand or Product”, “Artist, Band or Public Figure”, “Entertainment”, and “Cause or Community”. The closest to a means of controlling a personal pseudonymic identity is “Artist, Band or Public Figure”, which is limited alongside other Facebook pages in its interaction abilities.

By comparison/contrast, G+ only has “Storefront (Restaurant, Retail Store, hotel, etc.)”, “Service Area (Plumber, pizza delivery, taxi service, etc.)”, and “Brand (Product, sports team, music band, cause, etc.)”, which is even more confusing from the outset by the grouping of so many options into just three categories.

The ideal page

The ideal brand page system which would work perfectly for personal pseudonyms at the intimacy perhaps most desired by drag performers in an SNS, IMO, is a combination of Facebook’s presentation and G+’s functionality and interactivity:

  • Having at least 6 page-creation options including “Artist, Band or Public Figure”, or even a 7th “Character or Pseudonym” option.
  • Having the ability to follow/be followed by users and create/join groups “as” the brand page.
  • Have the option to switch to a preferred brand page identity upon login to one’s personal user identity.
  • Have the ability to restrict access to one’s personal profile while simultaneously operating a brand-page identity.

In such a system, performance artists such as drag performers would have the full ability to interact with their fans as their pseudonyms or public personas, to organize their fans into discussion groups (both public, private and secret) under their personas, and to easily invite fans to events (or even games and apps), all without revealing or exposing any of their personal profiles to the public.

When the brand pages are not fully baked, not fully conceptualized as alternative identities for both individuals and corporated groups, the ability to control your presence is hobbled. Performers like Sister Roma offer an opportunity for Facebook, G+ and the SNS sites of our era to not only listen more to their users, but to make their brand pages more useful for more people. The “Real Name” policy (as well as the restriction against multiple profiles on sites like LinkedIn) only hurts privacy, doesn’t help the quality of conversations on Facebook, and is not remedied by half-baked brand page tools.

Adding an electric car cut the payback point of our solar panel investment in half

Kevin C. Tofel's avatarGigaom

When we discussed our home solar panel project in mid-2011 with friends, one of the first questions everyone asked was, “What’s the payback period before you break-even?” The second question was unsurprisingly, “How much is it costing you?” but the focus always ended up on the payback. After all, if you’re going to invest in green technology, you’re hoping that at some point in the near future, you get ahead of the game. It turns out that something we didn’t plan for — our Chevrolet Volt(s gm) — is actually helping us boost the ROI and cut our payback time in half.

Details of the solar panel investment

Solar panel framingI shared details on both the solar panel project and the car before, but let me step back and recap a bit. In October 2011, we added 41 solar panels to our southern-facing roof in southeastern Pennsylvania. Each panel is rated…

View original post 736 more words

Google Glass will soon be invisible – and the new normal

It depends on the openness and adaptability of the technology, but I digress…

Guest Column's avatarGigaom

“There are three sides to every story: Your side, my side, and the truth. And no one is lying.” – Robert Evans (“The Kid Stays in the Picture”)

I recently met up with my friend and one-time business partner, Steve Lee, who is product director on the Google Glass project, and before that, ran product management on Google Maps for Mobile. Other than a quick tour of the device, Steve basically let me dive in, so as to experience Glass with a beginner’s mind. I won’t bother reviewing the basic capabilities and specs, which have been covered exhaustively already. Instead I want to focus on some of the points that are in debate, and whether I believe that Glass is destined to succeed.

Glass is translucent; designed to be invisible

In “Waves of Power,” David Moschella shows how new disruptive industries begin as verticals, since the complete product solution requires…

View original post 839 more words

The impact of digital technology and the internet on modern societies

Re-posted from NMAC 3145-01:

The impact of digital technology and the Internet upon modern societies is most evinced in the rapidity of communication between any two or more individuals. Such rapidity has amplified the emotional ramifications attached to such communications, but has also helped in the often-remote coordination of common objectives (Howe).

Digital technology and the Internet have also impacted the nature of transactions of money or other resources (e-commerce, donations, etc.). The ability to peruse and pay through the same medium unifies methods of correpondence retail that previously existed, such as television shopping and catalog books which would be purchased by phone.

Finally, the internationalized nature of the Internet has prompted societies to obtain digital technology which is capable of accessing the Internet or other networks, namely to accomplish the two above objectives. The Internet has furthered the globalization of business and commerce (Kluver), strongly increasing the legitimacy of the service sector at the expense of the industrial sector, and has aided speakers of myriad languages to comment on or appropriate tropes and trends from myriad societies for their own benefit.

–Works cited–

Howe, Jeff. “The Rise of Crowdsourcing“. Wired. Condé Nast Digital. Jun 2006. Web.

Kluver, Randy. “Globalization, Informatization, and Intercultural Communication”. Oklahoma City University. Web.

Photoshop’s impact on society

Reposted from NMAC 3145-01:

Photoshop has so impacted our society that “to Photoshop” has become de-facto genericized as a verb for “to engage in the act of editing an image with image-editing software, usually Adobe Photoshop”. Adeptness at using Photoshop in order to indiscreetly insert or remove a property into or from a picture (without betraying the manipulated or illusory nature of the image to other viewers) is considered a work of art or act of competition in some quarters.

The utility of Photoshop is apparent in the high-stakes world of advertising, as artists and photo editors are pressured to make direct visual appeals to the eyes of potential customers for the advertised wares.

Photoshop has also impacted photography for such applications as fashion. One of the more controversial results of this impact is the usage of Photoshop to airbrush flaws from the photographed faces of models, leading to accusations of deceptive advertising in regards to cosmetics advertisements.

This, among many others, tends to give credence to the view of Photoshop as a double-edged sword depending upon the purpose or manner of usage.

–Works cited–

Macworld Staff. “Photoshop through the Years”Macworld. 1 Aug 2000. Web.

Edwards, Jim. “US Moves Toward Banning Photoshop In Cosmetics Ads.” Business Insider. 16 Dec 2011. Web.

Typefaces and perception of content

A typeface impacts my perception of content by the manner in which the typeface fits into the 1) layout and 2) the application. A news or information website, for example, will reasonably make use of a typeface which is easy to read and presents information with urgency and importance.

If the same website were to make use of a typeface which adds “style” or pizazz to the content, it wouldn’t communicate the same urgency or importance. A “Western-style” typeface, for example, only suits certain situations, such as stylistic, period-style advertisements.  A typeface which is in the style of one of Sagmeister’s creations would fit grunge music or goth metal websites.

However, if a website were tailored toward the selling of certain products, then the typefaces would most reasonably fit the sorts of products being sold. If I go to Apple.com, select a word on the website, right-click to select “Inspect Element” in Chrome, and de-select “Lucida Grande” from the list of CSS attributes, the resulting serif-ed typeface simply wouldn’t fit the graphic theme of the rest of the page, which calls for smooth but “faint” and “light” tips and flourishes, as most of the graphics of the website communicate.

So the choice of certain typefaces are more purposed toward being part of the website’s graphic layout. Compare with a news or information website which is purposed toward presenting information, not products of any particular aesthetic. Such typefaces do their job when they immerse the user into the presentation’s theme and core topic, and do their job when they elicit a reaction as desired by the website’s owners.

pro-bono Marketing

I’ve thought about the idea of “pro-bono marketing” recently. Basically, just like pro-bono legal services, it involves providing one’s advocational skills to clients on the basis of “the public good”, and just like pro-bono medical services, they provide means of maintaining the health and integrity of some specific aspect of a legal person’s vitality (in this case, the brand reputation is at stake) to those who are not able to afford the same services at higher prices.

Brittany Eaton, M.S., of the Columbus, Ohio AMA suggests providing pro-bono marketing work for non-profit organizations as a means for improving your resume, keeping yourself busy in a struggling economy and improving one’s own local community’s prospects, while Steve Sammartino posits the reciprocal and chance-driven benefit(s) of pro-bono marketing.

Personally, I think it’s something that should be standardized for marketing students. Perhaps we can have university-maintained “marketing clinics” (akin to legal clinics) in the future?

New Media, Personalities and Permanent Campaigns

Much has been made about perpetual or permanent campaigns since Patrick Caddell first proposed the idea for the Carter administration in 1976; Sidney Blumenthal would coin the term and flesh out the concept in his 1980 book “The Permanent Campaign”, and the term would gradually come to be used against future incumbent Presidents, including current President Barack Obama.

The idea of the perpetual/permanent campaign is that, once a candidate is elected to office, the new president must continually maintain the confidence and attention of the public in his or her administration, must observe the popularity of the administration in the eyes of participants in political polls, and must continually canvas the public in order to build enough confidence to withstand a backlash by oppositional figures through media outlets.

This reliance upon media in order to build public confidence has been criticized as being reflective of desires by sitting incumbents for short-term gains rather than a long-term dedication to adopted policy.

However, can the idea of the permanent campaign also apply to the growing efforts of previously-failed candidates for the presidency?

Since 2008, the presidential campaign of Ron Paul and the vice-presidential campaign of Sarah Palin have both re-organized themselves in order to maintain active fan groupings and political action committees well into the 2012 presidential election season, and serve as critical examples of this .

Campaign for Liberty was the official name given by Paul to his former presidential campaign, turning it into a non-profit that would promote his libertarian principles, promote endorsed candidates and organize events for fans of the 12-term Texas congressman. In addition, a youth wing (Young Americans for Liberty) and multiple independently-maintained fan websites dedicated to Ron Paul have continued to publish during both on- and off-years. Multiple calls for Paul to run for office again in 2012 emanate mostly from this camp, a fact that is critiqued in some circles from an ethical perspective.

Likewise, Even after having lost the Republican presidential campaign alongside Sen. John McCain, Palin has refused to withdraw into obscurity as do many other former candidates for the office or party nominations. Instead, she maintained an active media presence by issuing periodic speeches both before audiences and directly to her viewers on YouTube, beginning the consolidation of her political base through the establishment of SarahPAC (ostensibly-described as an energy independence advocacy group) and endorsing candidates for other offices throughout the United States.

Both politicians have made direct-to-camera addresses which win regular plaudits from their fanbases and their endorsed candidates are heavily promoted in banner advertisements on fan websites such as Conservatives4Palin.com and DailyPaul.com. Such occurs even during election off-years.

Compare this to the continuous campaigns of individuals such as Lyndon LaRouche and Ralph Nader. Both aspirants continue to maintain (admittedly minimal or fringe) presences on the Web, with LaRouche’s presence being the more controversial and longer-existing of the two, and both have repeatedly ran for the same office. Even as their respective candidacies barely made a dent in the popular vote at every election, LaRouche and Nader may have pioneered the idea of a New Media-driven permanent campaign, with a growing number of candidates realizing in the 2000’s that such campaigns do not have to end on an election year and do not have to specifically exist for the aspirations of one candidate, either. In fact, they could come, as the participants in these campaigns often vocally accept, to circumvent the nominatory power of political parties.

So when conference appearances and fireside chats are syndicated to these fan websites, and such sites serve as the core of the reserve support base from whence these candidates hope to derive for themselves and others, what sort of electoral cycle – or perhaps government – are we formulating?

Comparable to this growth of fan websites as the emerging core of personality-driven political movements, political parties in party-list proportional-representational democracies such as the Netherlands, Belgium and Israel are both noteworthy and notorious for small political parties being formed by – and for – personalities rather than policies. The end result of such systems are often election cycles which see no single party gain a majority and ministerial cabinets which must be formed around coalitions of multiple, personality- or niche-driven political parties.

Even in presidential republics with plurality-based elections, personality-driven political movements have often had long-running effects upon the body politic; an outstanding, recent example is that of Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who ran for the presidency of Mexico in 2006 but created a political coalition which disputed the results and created a “legitimate presidency” in opposition to the current incumbent. The movement continues to this day with various public events and López Obrador, who started his own television talk show in 2007, intends to run for office again in 2012.

Walter Dean Burnham, in his own analysis of Blumenthal’s work, cited the capability of these movements to exist against or outside the confines of political parties:

“Instead of being channeled through–and thus revitalizing–the political parties, this realignment involved the conclusive marginal displacement of these parties by the permanent campaign…. The older linkages between rulers and ruled become ever hazier, ever more problematic.”

This description of the permanent campaign by incumbent officials may also describe the linkages between candidates and their supporters, as such long-term presumptive candidates wield power through their media connections to their fans, with regular dissemination of commentary being useful to regularly rally the fans against incumbent politicians or existing laws.

The personality-driven permanent campaign through New and Old Media is a style that may very well make a mockery of existing political parties in presidential, plurality-based republics like our own and Mexico. But the accommodation of these increasingly-powerful and established aspirations – aspirations which are, at one, personality-driven, and at the same time, very ideologically-tinged – are likely to force us to rethink our ideas about politics and democracy.

Specialty fragmentation of microblogging: Possible?

From the beginning of blogging in the late 1990s with LiveJournal, Blogger and other services, the trend toward fragmentation by niche specialization began to slowly progress, with many bloggers coming to form communities of bloggers around specific causes or identities.

From the beginning of YouTube in 2005, we have seen the gradual fragmentation of video hosting community websites into a multitude of niche hosting services, a number of which also double as blogging communities.

Since the rise in prominence and attention of microblogs, many of which have become integrated into social networking websites, a number of server software packages, such as StatusNet and Diaspora, have been developed in order to support the development of microblogging communities outside of Twitter, Tumblr and Facebook.

However, one question comes to mind: is it as possible for niche microblogging services to be developed for high-ideological-threshold communities in the same way that blog hosts and video hosts have been fragmented?

The growth in traffic to blog and video hosts can be attributed in part to the function of search engines such as Google; for example, Google’s Video service largely gave way to Google Video Search, which gradually increased in the number of video hosts included in its aggregation of video (helping in the diversification of the video hosting market in the process), while Technorati played a large, early role in the aggregation and popularization of blogs, blogrolls and other features of the “blogosphere”. Currently, Google’s “Realtime Search” is playing a large role in the indexing of microblog posts on a limited number of social networking websites, including Twitter, Facebook, Myspace and Google Buzz.

What may dictate how microblogging will fragment into competing, niche-specific microblogging services may not necessarily be the usefulness of the services to their users, but rather the ability to communicate to users from competing services (i.e., between Twitter and Tumblr).

How specialized microblogging services may benefit CNN or some other major news outlet – that is, where such organizations can establish their own hosted microblogs – beyond their own employees has yet to be seen; blogs and microblogs are already extensively used by the same organizations to great effect, although the microblogs of employees are usually hosted on Twitter rather than being self-hosted.

Distinct trends may emerge out of the fragmentation of microblogs in order to increase the relevance and efficacy of stories and information which is broadcast through such means.