Category Archives: Uncategorized

Bicycle-only Interstates and Highways – No Cars Allowed (Seriously!)

Learn how to make your own battery with my book DIY Lithium Batteries: http://a.co/jcc2OzV or check out my second book – The Ultimate DIY Ebike Guide: http://a.co/2Yys1kf

The parts that I use for building batteries:
18650 cells (Sanyo GA 3500mAh): https://goo.gl/J6ONJV
18650 cells (another Sanyo GA 3500mAh source): https://goo.gl/f10wHH
18650 cells (Samsung 26F 2600mAh): https://goo.gl/VhpP7T
18650 cells (Panasonic 18650B 3400mAh): https://goo.gl/fvwJZQ
18650 cells (Another Panasonic 18650B): https://goo.gl/tVjREI
18650 positive insulating washer: https://goo.gl/HBVOuc
Ebike battery cases: https://goo.gl/W2DLmE
Nickel strip: http://goo.gl/VIrNQq
Spot welder: https://goo.gl/KN3Uaw
BMSs: http://goo.gl/S6gSQx
Silicone wire: http://goo.gl/xmpbKD
Black 18650 cell spacers: http://goo.gl/hQxWF6
Vruzend cell spacers: https://goo.gl/5ReLqA
Large heat shrink tubing: http://goo.gl/6v1ow9
Small heat shrink tubing: https://goo.gl/OU3Z6u
Foam sheet for protecting battery: http://goo.gl/5e71tE
Kapton tape: https://goo.gl/D6BT57
Chargers: https://goo.gl/js0T0V

350W hubmotor: https://goo.gl/K1mYvR
36V/48V controllers I used: https://goo.gl/nJBnJP
Throttle: https://goo.gl/UebsNC
Cycle Analyst: https://goo.gl/RsmE3N
350W Bafang BBS01: https://goo.gl/peyiYb
500W Bafang BBS02: https://goo.gl/EsqHu2
750W Bafang BBS02: https://goo.gl/k81aVH
1000W Bafang BBSHD: https://goo.gl/MU69oh

Special thanks to the Times of Israel for their Yom Kippur footage (https://ift.tt/2TJ3PL5) and to Itai Rotem as well (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIlOZWhqM3U)

***Question response book giveaway rules***
When you guys asks questions in the comments of my videos, I’ll try to answer them. If there are questions that I think would make a good video response, I’ll choose them to do a longer segment. If I choose your question for a video response, you’ll win a copy of my book The Ultimate DIY Ebike Guide (the paperback or the ebook), or my book DIY Lithium Batteries.
Here are some things that YouTube makes me say: This contest is not sponsored by YouTube and YouTube isn’t affiliated with it. I’m supposed to provide a link to the community guidelines for YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/t/community_gu…). YouTube is not a sponsor of this “contest” and by participating, you are releasing YouTube from any potential liability, whatever that might be. Privacy notice: I won’t steal your info. If you do win, you can choose to send me your address so I can mail you a paperback copy of the book (or some other prize if that changes) or you can send me an email address and I’ll send you a copy of the ebook. I will do everything in my power to immediately forget your personal information afterwards.

Music provided by BenSounds (“Happiness”)

via YouTube

What Happened to Taiwan?

Marriage equality has lost a battle at the polls in Taiwan in a bad year for progressives there, but this result is likely to go to court as to whether it is constitutional at all.

First thought: Yikes. This is almost Prop 8 levels of bad. Almost.

Second: We should really lay the blame for this on the DPP and Tsai Ing-Wen. They took NO action for LGBT people since they won the last national election (unlike what they promised), and allowed the opposition to set this absurd frame against LGBT people and their rights. The DPP deserved to lose in the local election as badly as they did, and I expect them to lose again in 2020 no matter how they treat LGBT people after this referendum.

Third: This places the government between their own statutory law regarding the effects of referendums and the Constitutional Court regarding their interpretations of law. The ruling will go into effect by next year in spite of this referendum, but how will the DPP implement it in order to placate voters? If the conservative KMT wins in 2020, how will they implement it or recognize it?

Fourth: A civil unions/partnerships bill (especially one akin to Thailand’s, or the one that was approved by voters as a second-class relationship recognition) would still run afoul of the ruling, and by now may not be recognized in most countries which have moved from civil partnerships to marriage equality as far as spousal visas are concerned. Why would Taiwan go this route if even the United States, Taiwan’s biggest ally, is stripping spousal visas from unmarried same-sex partners of U.S.-residing diplomats?

Fifth: Almost ALL of the pan-green referendum questions failed at the ballot this year. “Pan-Green” = progressive AND pro-independence from China. The DPP, which is a pan-green party, failed miserably at the polls in city council and mayoral seats this election. This was not a good year for progressives – be they anti-nuke, pro-LGBT, pro-independence – at the ballot box. Pro-LGBT activists were caught off-guard and were out-organized and out-funded, which is why marriage equality went down 70-20. They need to retake the frame from the reactionaries, not rely on the DPP or the pan-green camp, and build coalitions to weaken such a high opposition in a record-high turnout year.


Sixth: This was Taiwan’s first time with this referendum process. What were the problems with it? Vote integrity is a must, and the process which took place should be vetted for any potential failings or indiscretions. 

I can’t hide it: I’m entertaining thoughts of “(State) Sen. Stacey Abrams” or “U.S. Rep. Stacey Abrams”. I could see her succeeding John Lewis in CD-05 in the future, and maybe become that future Speaker of the U.S. House that the Washington Post wants her to be.

But then again, throughout the campaign, I kept hearing volunteers and strong Democratic voters alike mistakenly calling her “Senator Abrams”, so why not have her succeed Steve Henson as Senate Minority Leader? “Senator Abrams” rolls off the tongue with the honey of prestige better than “Leader Abrams”, IMO.

#PoliticalFanfiction #SenatorAbrams #Abrams4Congress

The States of North Georgia and South Georgia

What if we split the state in half, roughly along the Fall Line?

I wonder what the impact would be on our politics and demographics. 60+ northern counties becoming their own state, 90+ southern counties becoming their own. 

What would the capital of South Georgia be? Savannah? Tifton? Would it be even more agriculturally-dependent than Georgia is right now? 

And what would the impact on Georgia Democrats be when they are split between these two states? Most of the Democratic base is concentrated in Metro Atlanta, but African-American voters who straddle both sides or live even further south of the Fall Line give more geographic breadth to the Democrats outside of the most urbanized areas. So many of these rural Democratic counties in “South Georgia”, especially in Southwest Georgia and the Savannah area, are Black Belt counties where the ancestors of their current African-American residents once toiled the soil as slaves and sharecroppers. “North Georgia”, by comparison, didn’t have as much rich soil to attract plantation owners to such an extent, especially not in Appalachian 

But at the same time, perhaps it would wean the DPG further away from its historic legacy as a party dependent on the agricultural sector for votes, and center the party as a pro-industry, pro-economic diversification party.

Vox: House Democrats don’t need a leader, they need someone to represent them on TV

I’d even push this further: a shadow cabinet or speakers’ bureau of House members as critics of portfolios based on the presidential cabinet and cabinet-level positions. They don’t have to be House Dem leadership or committee chairs, just as long as they are the go-to spokespersons for the House Dems.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, for example, could be the caucus critic for either Labor or the EPA. Seth Moulton could be the caucus critic for Transportation. Adam Schiff could be the critic on either Finance or Intelligence. Ro Khanna could be the critic on Commerce and the FCC. 

And why not include Democratic senators? Bernie Sanders could be the caucus critic on Health and Human Services. 

I think it’s time that Democrats introduced a tradition of shadow cabinets to American politics.

Fighting For Pride: Swaziland #CreatorsForChange

Filmmaker Riyadh Khalaf explores the struggles of Swaziland’s LGBTQ+ community. In the face of persistent homophobia, anti-gay laws and threats of violence, this film documents the journey of Swazi activists as they attempt to put on their historic first-ever Pride march.

This project was made possible by the YouTube Creators For Change Program. For more info go to http://www.youtube.com/yt/creators-for-change

Swaziland Pride was made possible with the support of All Out – A global movement for love and equality. Donate to support here: https://ift.tt/2EqP9eP

Watch the other incredible Creators For Change films here: yt.be/cfc/riyadhk

Subscribe for more content like this! – https://goo.gl/BqnGnw

Follow me:

INSTAGRAM: https://ift.tt/2a7vy0Z

TWITTER: https://twitter.com/RiyadhK

FACEBOOK: https://ift.tt/1CMfBYE

Mailing address:

FAO: Riyadh Khalaf,
United Agents,
12-26 Lexington Street,
London
W1F 0LE

via YouTube

Campaign Democrats & Party Democrats

Campaign Democrats are not the same as Party Democrats, at least in Georgia. 

These are usually completely different people. The Campaign Democrats are the (paid or unpaid) door-knockers, canvassers and regional staff during election year. They put a strong material, physical investment in their desire to get candidates elected. They are the idealists who want to get involved whether or not their candidate(s) get elected. 

Often, the campaign Democrats want to get involved in the steering of the party in the off-year, and are rudely surprised by how terrible the Party Democrats are at their job. 

The Party Democrats are the ones who are supposed to organize the county/district/state galas, raise money, organize meetings, and have a working knowledge of Robert’s Rules of Order. They usually screw things up despite their best intentions, miss meetings, hold their events rather late, and are rather rude and defensive when they are called out on their crap. But they are the grand old patricians of the party (or the hires of the patricians) who may or may not have paid their dues at some point within the last 40 years.

Party Democrats ignore how dilapidated the party structure is, and won’t ever change the bylaws until the bylaws’ antiquity and poor design bite them in the ass. 

tl;dr:

Love most of our Democratic candidates and our campaigners. 

Hate this party, though. 😤😡🙄

How Far We’ve Swung

The Hill: The political pendulum is swinging back from conservative control in so many ways

Last time Nancy Pelosi took office as Speaker of the House in 2007, it was in the last Congress of George W. Bush’s Republican presidency. She came in on a wave election, gaining the Senate and the House after a long exile of Democrats from the Speaker’s seat dating back from 1994. She would hold the seat for a short four years, losing it in 2010 during Barack Obama’s first midterm. 

This time, Nancy Pelosi has done something that Democrats haven’t done since 1930: flip the House and take the Speakership in an opposing President’s first midterm. Within the same period, Republicans have done this 3 times: 1946, 1994 and 2010. The latter two happened during the post-Civil Rights era described in this article. 

Because this is such a rare event, Pelosi is now garnering comparisons to other Speakers of the House who used their bully pulpit to rhetorically oppose the White House within the last century: Democrats like Tip O’Neill, Republicans like Newt Gingrich and John Boehner. But Pelosi will take office in an era closer to the hyper-partisanship of the latter two GOP speakers, and will have the chance to hew herself closer to or distinguish herself from O’Neill, who managed to find ways to work with Reagan and his Republican Senate. By comparison, Gingrich and Boehner fought desperate knife-fights with their Democratic presidents to make them one-term presidents. 

She may have to find a way to use all of those three examples, but her prior experience in the Speakership – with a weakened President on his way out as well as a Senate in her party’s grasp – will be less useful. She has a creepy President who values loyalty, uses his opponents to shield himself from scrutiny, and abuses his authority flagrantly. Can she milk this President, or will she have to get into a knife fight for the next two or more years?

That may be a good measure of how intense the swing away from this party era’s conservatism may be.

You don’t work together from a position of allowing yourself to be walked over. Al Franken didn’t let himself be walked over in the 2008 Senate race in Minnesota, and he fought for every vote until he won by 225 votes over Norm Coleman.

At this point, I’d have less respect for Abrams, Gillum and Nelson if they walked away from this fight, if they allowed themselves to give up on the vote count. Sinema is sticking to her guns in Arizona, and now she’s ahead of McSally. 

Republicans understand that the goal is to win by any means necessary and govern by strength, and I respect that belief enough to duplicate it. Is it petty? Is it bitter? So what. It’s also smart. 

#CountEveryVote