Category Archives: Uncategorized

A PC maker should buy a smartphone maker

Seriously, if Apple’s implementation of the smartphone can spark a flurry of similar implementations by traditional phone makers, then I think that one of the major PC makers (NO, not Dell or HP) should buy one of the smartphone makers.

Why?

Because a PC maker could envision a smartphone as being more of a smaller-sized laptop, and could both design and build it – hardware-wise – to handle alot of what is often left to laptops/notebooks to handle.

This would take the smartphone from being a simple “phone + email and text” to a simple “mobile desktop computer + phone;” clearly, the smartphone makers are focusing on the former, while Apple, a desktop maker, is focusing on the latter.

Why doesn’t the ANC have a Lavender League?

I think that if the African National Congress claims to represent the post-apartheid era’s diversity (they already have the women’s league and youth league), then they should also accommodate those who have been sidelined even by the ANC until only fairly recently in the party’s history.

In my opinion, the lack of an LGBT-friendly presence of influence within the ANC’s organization speaks a bit about how the organization’s politics have stated a shallow, forced support for South Africa’s gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgenders. It may also be a translation of the demeaned stature of LGBTs in South African society, as they have never been fully or truly accepted as human beings by the populace both before and after apartheid.

2012 and the mobile Internet

A generation, according to one definition, last 18 years. The baby boomer generation, for example, has been historically applied to those who were born between 1946 and 1964 (in other interpretations, that time period combines the Baby Boomers with Generation Jones). Thus, if you follow the 18-year model, you end up with the following timeline:

  • 1946-1964 (encompassing the Baby boomers and Generation Jones)
  • 1964-1982 (encompassing Generation X)
  • 1982-2000 (encompassing Generation Y and some of the present “New Silent Generation”)
  • 2000-2018

I would like to pay particular attention to the generations 1964-1982 and 1982-2000. The former was marked by the solidification of television as a communication medium (at the expense of radio), the rise and levelling of the hippie subculture, the stagnation of the Cold War, and the rise of political terrorism. The latter, however, was marked by the introduction of computers and the Internet as a communication medium (at the expense of television), the rise and levelling of the punk and metal subcultures, the end of the Cold War, and the initial rise of religious fundamentalist terrorism.

Then I’d like to pay particular attention to what I call “pivot years”, or specific years within each of these timespans that marked the beginning of trends which continued (in much more evolved and entrenched states) into the next period. My initial placing of “pivot years” lies on each 12th year within each period. Thus:

  • 1958
  • 1976
  • 1994
  • 2012

I’m not prepared to comment on the eventual importance of 1958 to the following generation. However, I am prepared to comment on the importance of the following two dates:

  • 1976: Apple Computer was founded. (Microsoft was registered as a corporation to the state of New Mexico this same year)
  • 1994: Netscape was founded as “Mosaic Communications Corporation”. (The Yahoo! search engine was launched this same year by Jerry Yang and David Filo at Stanford University, and was incorporated as a business in 1995.)

Both companies have obviously played a preeminent role in the computing arena that continued, in an evolved form, into the following generations. While Apple was founded  during the latter age of hippies, it found its greatest exposure during the 1982-2000 generation (when computing and the Internet had first entered the home as niche consumer appliances), and it seems poised to play a lesser role in the 2000-2018 generation. Furthermore, Apple was part of the extremely competitive home computing market that surged from 1976 to 1984.

Meanwhile, while Netscape was founded during the 1982-2000 generation, its products (now under the Mozilla brand) have found an extensive and partially-commanding reach in the 2000-2018 generation (when computing and the Internet have become entrenched and ubiquitous). Furthermore, it was part of the extremely competitive free-for-alls which influenced the computing industry from 1994 to 2001, such as the Browser wars and the Dot-com bubble.

However, if 1976 and 1994 were the pivot years of their timespans, then what about 2012?

What does 2012 hold in store for computing and the Internet?

Personally, I think that it will involve the mobile smartphones and ubiquitous Internet-dependent devices which are so commonplace these days. However, like the previous pivot years, it could very likely involve the following:

  • the prior creation of a Web-dependent application that will make mobile or ubiquitous computing devices useful and stimulating to millions of people
  • establishment of a slew of companies which rely upon and monetize that medium, and the entry of older-generation companies which will cater to these companies
  • the gradual driving down of prices, rates and other financial hurdles (e.g., Internet rates) to record lows and the increasing of Internet capacity and reach to record widths and lengths due to the introduction of competitive prices and disruptive technologies.

This period of initial rat-race competition can last from 2012 to 2018, and may be dependent upon technologies and applications that will be created by as early as 2009 in their most rudimentary state.

What it will be, I have no idea. I can only hope that I will be employed by one of those companies.

Web Video forms

Here’s an idea for creating easy web video widgets. It could likely use XUL and SVG.

<?xml version=”1.0″?>
<?xml-stylesheet href=”chrome://global/skin” type=”text/css”?>

<window title=”XUL Video”
        xmlns:html=”http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml&#8221;
        xmlns=”http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul”&gt;
   <vbox align=”center”>
<video src=”width: 200px; height: 200px” src=”images/betty_boop.ogg” />
<button flex=”1″ image=”images/playbutton.jpg”
       onclick=”Play(‘myVideo’);” />
<groupbox>
  <caption label=”determined” />
   <progressmeter id=”my-progressmeter” mode=”determined” value=”10″ progressscrollbutton=”images/progressscrollbutton.jpg” />
  </groupbox>
<button image=”images/stopbutton.jpg”
       onclick=”Play(‘myVideo’);” />
</vbox>
</window>

Spokeo: a double-edged sword

If you give it your email address’s contact list, it will pull up the majority of the contact list’s members from their profiles on major social networking and media sharing sites.

I was given an e-mail invite from someone, and was surprised by how Spokeo immediately pulled up everything that the contact list’s inhabitants have done recently on all of these sites. Wikipedia has a list.

It’s fucking creepy, and one runs the risk of accidentally mass-spamming the entire contact list with invites. However, despite its shortcomings, it does have a good interface, and it does give a frighteningly-superb view of social networking profiles rolled up for easy pickings.

Empire and the separation of powers

Does separation of political powers curtail us from the imperialisms of the past states? Or is a further separation of powers necessary?

Reading the Wikipedia article on separation of powers, I take notice of the other branches of government that have been added to the systems of government in a few countries:

  • In both Costa Rica and Venezuela, the electoral and auditory branches
  • in Germany, the constitutional court and presidential electoral college
  • in Taiwan, the control (auditory) and civil examination branches

The goal of the separation of powers is to keep the direction of government policy from falling in the hands of a single individual (dictatorship or totalitarianism) or group (oligarchy).

But that separation of powers did not prevent the Roman Republic (separated between the senate, the executive and the Roman assemblies) from turning into the Roman Empire, nor did it prevent the early United States from moving ever-so-westward to California, stomping other, “lesser peoples” into either the ground or the reservations along the way, resulting in a U.S. empire that stretched “from sea to shining sea” (and then some more land on the other side of that other sea as well).

Yet, let’s face it. Both the Roman Republic and the United States were/are excessively dependent upon their militaries as defense mechanisms, even though the United States, since the end of WW2, uses its own military (and its accompanying goods) more as a “big switch” to shake at errant nations.

So what does it take for us to extricate the government from the use of armed force as a means of accomplishing foreign policy aspirations?

Should the separation of powers be further spread out among a greater number of branches, which can then be made much more accountable/responsive to the citizenry by periodic ballot?

Will such a further delegation of powers place a plug into the need for a military that mostly resides outside the government’s grasp?

Forms in web feeds

I wonder if it will be possible to syndicate whole forms through RSS or Atom feeds, in which a whole form (i.e., an input form for your name, date and comment with a submit button) can be syndicated as a web feed.

That will be especially useful for posted comment feeds from whole blogs or single posts, such as this, only with a built-in reply form that you could use from within the feedreader rather than having to view the post’s original URL before commenting.

To be closer to home, this would be a web feed equivalent of the LiveJournal feature where you can reply to subscribed comments via an email form.

Live-streaming video in virtual worlds

I think that the much-feared ubiquitous camera surveillance – particularly webcams – will have a role to play in the future of multitouch and augmented reality. It will allow for devices to “peek” into other, far-removed areas in real time via streaming video.

Also, I think that this sort of “peeking” can be currently implemented in such virtual world applications as Second Life and Kaneva. Avatars can open up “holes” that can stream a “virtual camera”‘s view of another sim to the avatar’s view.

This could be useful to determine if the user may want to know about the current setting and appeal of another sim before teleporting to it. In fact, it could also serve as a tool of teleportation between sims.

Of course, such “streaming,” if taken to extremes, could further wear down on the Grid that runs the sims.

Multi-touch Compiz Fusion soon?

Yes, very soon.

Or at least an experimental build of Compiz for the MPX fork of X.Org (currently in development) by Peter Hutterer, replacing the simple, built-in MPWM window manager.

The catch is that we have to wait until 0.9 (development branch) comes out with the debut of Dave Reveman’s integrated Object-Framework. Once that occurs, this guy plans to start an experimental MPX branch of Compiz.

Unfortunately, 0.7.2 was only released 5 days ago, although Compiz Fusion’s update releases are notoriously fast (0.6.0 was released in October, and 0.7.0 was released in February). Therefore, the earliest that we can expect the release of 0.9 (if a Compiz release comes every 4 months) is by this coming October.

I anticipate YouTube video demos of a multi-touch Compiz. One guy explores the possibilities.