VIDEO: Doug Jones (D-AL) and Tina Smith (D-MN) Sworn Into Office as U.S. Senators

Talking Points Memo reports:

Former Vice President Joe Biden will escort Sen.-elect Doug Jones (D-AL) to his swearing-in ceremony on Wednesday morning, according to CNN and local reports from Alabama. While the state colleague typically accompanies a new senator to the swearing-in ceremony, Jones did not ask Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) to attend, AL.com and WAAY TV reported Tuesday evening. Jones’ ceremony is scheduled for noon on Wednesday and he plans to do his swearing-in on a personal family Bible, according to AL.com.

The Minneapolis Star-Tribune reports:

Tina Smith, who served three years as Minnesota’s lieutenant governor and worked behind the scenes as an influential DFLer for years before that, will join the U.S. Senate on Wednesday. Smith’s rapid elevation to the Senate follows the resignation of former Sen. Al Franken, who stepped down a day earlier following sexual harassment allegations. Smith, 59, will become Minnesota’s junior senator alongside Sen. Amy Klobuchar, also a DFLer. That will make Minnesota just the fourth state to currently have two women as U.S. senators.

Smith is now the 22nd currently-sitting female senator, a record. Jones’ election nubs the Republican majority even more to 1 seat, so expect more tie-breaker votes from Pence. Smith intends to run for her new seat in November 2018, and Jones will be up for re-election to a full term in 2020.

Dem Candidate Releases Unfathomably Sad Campaign Ad

Read More At:
http://ift.tt/2xKVgb3

Support The Show On Patreon:
http://ift.tt/2nttJ9h

Here’s Our Amazon Link:
http://ift.tt/2puAyaT

Follow Kyle on Twitter:
http://www.twitter.com/kylekulinski

Like the show on Facebook:
http://ift.tt/1kRkasW

Clip from The Kyle Kulinski Show, which airs live on Blog Talk Radio and Secular Talk Radio Monday – Friday 11:00 AM – 12:30 PM Eastern time zone.

Listen to the Live Show or On Demand archive at:
http://ift.tt/1bGJ2eH

Check out our website – and become a member – at:
http://ift.tt/1e7WA2a

via YouTube

Marvel Studios’ Black Panther – Official Trailer

Long live the king. Watch the new trailer for Marvel Studios #BlackPanther. In theaters February 16! ► Subscribe to Marvel: http://bit.ly/WeO3YJ

Follow Marvel on Twitter: ‪https://twitter.com/marvel
Like Marvel on FaceBook: ‪http://ift.tt/16vwTpk

For even more news, stay tuned to:
Tumblr: ‪http://ift.tt/10UODuf
Instagram: http://ift.tt/2uzkUxd
Google+: ‪http://ift.tt/1qavToU
Pinterest: ‪http://ift.tt/2eiVHkd

via YouTube

Gab.ai’s Odd Idea of Downvoting Microblogs

Beyond the “deplorable” aspects of its content, Gab once had (until March 2017) an interesting technical aspect: fusing Twitter-style short-form microblogging with Reddit’s up/down-voting to popularly rank posts in page visibility.

I can only imagine how many problems Gab’s fusion of microblogging with up-downvotes created in terms of content moderation and user communication.

Apparently, the downvoting feature was removed in March 2017:

To reach its goal of diversifying its audience, the company has done only one thing: It removed the downvote button. Like on Reddit, users had the ability to vote a post higher or lower, determining its relevancy on the forum. Now items can only be voted up.

Gab’s new upvote-only option
Source: Mic/Gab.ai

Sanduja is convinced the change will make the platform more positive and inclusive. In a phone call, he said Gab removed downvotes because trolls were doing it for entertainment and to harass women who were defending themselves. Also, “there were a lot of social justice warriors and members of the far left coming into our site essentially trying to start a brouhaha.”

Huh.

I’m guessing the ethics of downvoting as a moderation tool have not yet been perfected, even on a site which fused most of the Twitter microbloggimg experience with Reddit’s downvoting feature.

In fact, Gab had both up/down-voting AND reblogging. Which one was used for its promotion algorithm if there was one? We’re they competing with each other?

And the difference between microblogging sites and news/question sites is how the former are geared toward a tighter, personal expression which isn’t necessarily meant to invite a high level response and assessment compared to posts on the latter. To place the scrutinizing tool of public downvoting on all microblog posts seems like not only a tool for massive abuse, but also a great waste of such a tool.

It reminds me of that one Gumball episode in which the characters 1-5 star-rate each other on an app, resulting in the entire town becoming paralyzed from doing anything in their lives in fear of losing their stars (someone actually tried to do this in real life).

Even scientific research has given a more complete view of the effects of public downvoting on longer-term user behavior, showing it to feed into martyr-like feelings and incentivizing the reduction of post quality.

It’s a bit like the much-requested “dislike” button which will likely never appear on Facebook. Those who dislike the “dislike” button – including Mark Zuckerberg himself- criticize the potential for abuse of users through vote-brigading. Facebook, which operates with more hierarchy in their design of posts and comments, has went their own way in adding “reaction buttons” to posts and comments.

To date, YouTube, Reddit, Quora and Stack Exchange are the only prominent sites to use downvoting as a moderation tool (Quora only allows comments to be downvoted). None of these would be considered a microblogging site.

I could only see downvoting of microblogs as something better than a user-abusive tool if the downvoting were implemented in a different way than how it is implemented as thumbs up-thumbs down on Reddit or YouTube. There has to be more than that.

Reading how Rahm Emanuel helped pull together left-wing and right-wing Democrats in order to win the 2006 midterms, I’m seeing the criticism about how the minority of right-wing Democrats like Heath Shuler wasn’t much help when it came to passing progressive legislation, since so many of them voted against the ACA, the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act, the Lilly Ledbetter Act, and so on.

So keeping a group of right-wing Democrats under the Democratic Caucus banner was a paper tiger.

Maybe it’s insurance?

There are people who obsess over how there aren’t enough x-ethnicity babies being born, that x-nation is dying off because of low birth rate and increased life expectancy, that “hordes” of “mud people” are infiltrating the country and impurifying the culture through their religion.

There are many such obsessives throughout the world, including people like Victor Orban and Vladimir Putin and Marine Le Pen and Brian Brown of NOM. They hate the ideas of gay marriage and immigration because their countries may become less White, less Christian, less “safe” and less familiar to themselves.

It’s the same fear that helped animate apartheid.

Brian Brown can conveniently defend Orban’s policy as an “appreciation of diversity” until Hungary begins to come to blows against their neighbors in the name of nationalist expansionism and “Greater Hungary”.

The comments underneath this article, justifying cutting off “freeloaders” and “moochers”, give me pause.

I think we’re soon to be at the point of secession – internal or external – when the rage against government assistance becomes a conflict over our very values as a nation.

It is now a character flaw to be on public assistance. The able-bodied middle class suburbanite who loudly professes on the Internet to owe no debt (“because I saved money and worked hard!”) is now our ubermenschen over the lives of the lowly, “lazy” “freeloader”.

May these days and these sentiments pass quickly.