Tag Archives: information technology

Facebook: the “UGLY”

This is part of a three-part article for The Macon Statement titled “Facebook: Good, Bad or Ugly?“.

Harry Underwood
October 11, 2010

Facebook: the “UGLY”

Over the Internet, particularly on such prominent uses of this network as the World Wide Web, browser security has long been an issue for those who use Microsoft Windows-based computers, as the platform has, for much of its history, been the primary target of malware infections and unscrupulous “black-hat” cracking (in other words, using a computer network to gain unauthorized entry into other computers for malicious, bad-faith purposes).

For Windows users who spend a large chunk of their waking hours on social network services such as Facebook, the threats of having a user account compromised or one’s own computer being compromised are very real and can manifest themselves when one is not aware or safeguarding of their own security or privacy.

For instance, the wide diversity of accessible media and apps hosted on the user or group pages of the website can hide malware

The implications of having one’s own Facebook user account compromised by another person can wreak havoc on one’s own sense of personal security and can, in extreme circumstances, force the user to create a new user account. However, tools for recovery of control over one’s own Facebook account exist on the site.

“Honestly, it has only ever happened once and it happened when I couldn’t gain access to my own account,” said Cameron Walker, a student at Macon State. “All I had to do was change my password and everything since then has been fine.”

File-sharing: my opinion

Originally posted here.

I have been watching the news lately, and alot of what I see has been dedicated to the so-called “crime” of file-sharing. The RIAA, the same organization which notifies the public whenever an artist’s newly-released record hits “silver”, “gold”,  or the ever-famous “platinum” status, has been slapping subpoenas on ordinary citizens in the United States, Canada, and even Europe, charging such people with “stealing, or tampering with, the copyrights of music artists”.

First of all, let this be certain: the RIAA is an organization of people who look out for the welfare and prosperity of the music industry fatcats, not for the artists. This organization is only satisfied with the three words: “Buy My CD”. Anything else is of no importance to this organization.

The organization only uses the word “copyright” for the benefit of the people who they are supposed to represent: the fatcats. To this end they will use and construe with any type of legal jargon that will either confuse the public and/or win the day for their clients.

Second, why is it that the music artists themselves are so against file-sharing? Look at how much money they make through live concerts and signature memorabilia! They can believe those utter lies about copyrights construed by the RIAA and the US government if they want to, but here’s a fact:

Most people will probably buy the artists new CD for the cover and the content of anything but the music on the CD, if they really had a reason to buy a CD.

Some of my friends have bought all of T.A. Shakur’s CD’s, but not for the music on that little plastic thing called a compact disk! They’ll buy it for anything but the music on the CD, like the photos, lyrics, and personal quotes of Tupac Amaru Shakur.

And finally, since when did music have a price upon it? I mean, do you pay for listening to the radio (unless you have satellite radio)?

If music should have a price, it should only be for that little plastic thing called a compact disk, not for the music that you listen to, and should have a right to listen to.

So, in that case, screw the so-called “record industry”! Music is not an object!